“A lot of talk about Synths being too strong for xenos, is honestly just - power-gamey Xenos trying to get Synths nerfed. Consider this, Synths do not have directional click, synths are really weak to acid. Yes, even industrial. Xenos, do not know how to fight a Synth - and so they are going to have to learn.”
Using a one-sider argument against objectively the most powerful role on the entire server that is part of the TDM loop is crazy to me. I am both not a xeno main and not a powergamer either, and we have PLENTY of proof that synthetics do not require directional click to kill xenomorphs.
“Currently, Specalized synths, Gen3’s have roughtly about the same amount of HP as a Marine with Light armor. Industrial have roughly the same amount of effective HP as a marine with heavy armor.
It is because Synths are always able to fight, regardless of HP, and are able to resist most stuns as a G3. It means that Synths appear more powerful to a xeno than what they actually are.”
Irrelevant, their lack of pain plus smartpack defensive mode makes them near unkillable unless you have two lurkers to slow lock it, and even then as long as the synth hasn’t broken self preservation and run off alone during the height of hive presence they should never die. Players such as Wickedcybs literally never die once throughout a round because they are in no real risk. (Based on discord testimony)
“If we are too fix Synth. We are going to have to up-root the entire WL. We’d have to rework it from square one. Mechanically, Synth is fine. it’s been the culture of synths. It always has been. Players have been brought to think in very toxic mindsets to what the WL is. It is hard, to talk about, or even figure out where to begin.”
“I will defend this council, even the mistakes it makes”
So you defend the state of things as they are, including delta level allowing synths to cade pull and just run out and murder with no risk to self? I think that blindly defending the council and their mistakes is a perhaps poor wording on your behalf.
You can defend the good the council has made, but you shouldn’t defend the mistakes but take accountability for them. I’ll act in good faith and assume you meant that.
“If we are too fix Synth. We are going to have to up-root the entire WL. We’d have to rework it from square one.”
Would this require a new council? If the whitelist is to be entirely reworked would that mean the council thereby should be reworked as well?
“As I was the one who broke the Camels back in this situation with my initial feedback thread.”
I never read that thread to be honest.
" The WL as it stands is in a horrible spot, but it can be fixed it just needs time, be patient. I will say though after certain events, toxic behavior and calling for certain people within council to lose their status"
That is not the purpose of this thread, and condemning community members who act in bad faith is out of scope of the issue and a diversion entirely from the problems at hand by placing the council itself in the center as a victim when that is not the problem. The problem is the whitelist, any council member is inherently a cog in the machine. Please future posts keep on topic when talking about the whitelist.