Clarity regarding a new ruling in Announcements.

How would this be enforced and what was the main intention of this ruling to be put out?
Is this meant for Hostile CLF survivors to stop them from camping marine bodies for example?
I personally am not too sure where this ruling was intended to be applied most upon,
What rule would this be classified under as well, Rule 4 for No Griefing?

Also, there isn’t anything really reflecting it within the rules in general.
(Only time perma-killing is mentioned in the rules)


Nothing for round removal.
image

I don’t want to be pedantic but I am a little confused by the ruling and just want it clarified.

3 Likes

I thinks it’s meant to protect CLF survs for some reason. Which I kinda get if they surrender.

2 Likes

How does this work within military law? It seems like a dumb rule. I could understand if it applied to marine on marine violence, but CLF? The hostile terrorists who can shoot you in the face are immune from being permad? What happens if you accidentally decap someone?

I love vague sweeping statements. Very cool and not at all confusing.

2 Likes

It works both ways - CLF survs can’t decap marines either now.

2 Likes

Not gonna lie. Making it a “you must save CLF” sounds stupid as fuck. Would the real marines try and rescue å mortally wounded terrorist?

4 Likes

Whoever cooked this - I wish hostile surv permas their CIC, their med, their req and their whole ship. What a disgusting idea, holy guacamole

People take hostile surv to lockerhide and grief. Now we’re forced to save lockerhiding griefers. Amazing

7 Likes

Does this only apply to human on human combat? Is there a paragraph missing that adds context. This is vague.

Sadly the real life marine corps is not bound to CMs rule set :pensive:

2 Likes

As it should be.

Become a CO and execute terrorists

2 Likes

I think it’s more meant to be “CLF shouldn’t just mag dump their gun into marines after already killing them to perma them and vice versa.”

you know the HVH ruleset of “Don’t make people perma by shooting them after they’re dead”

1 Like

See that makes sense to me.

That’s also understandable. But still, both sides shouldn’t go out of their way with limited resources to revive the other. Because as was speculated earlier on how you must try to revive them, how is a line CLF dude supposed to do it?

1 Like

I don’t know but it doesn’t say anything about the USCM or CLF having to revive people they killed, only they shouldn’t perma kill revivable, so i assume it just means don’t purposefully decap dead bodies and such.

1 Like

In my years of rolling CLF 24/7, why is this a thing? I mean when your rolling for a hostile factions, your expecting to be killed and presumably you want to see some HvH action. Sedition allows the USCM to round removal at any point of the game. Also round removing people from your own faction is already a rule break on its own for griefing. But round removing people from other factions is a different thing unless its your ally or something.

3 Likes

Hi. I was DP who kinda kicked this off. Brought back dead revivable CLF. Someone (XO or ASO, I forget) was like ‘We’ll handle it’. For them to have something to handle I defibbed them and punched them back into near-dead so they still had someone to do questioning or whatever else they had in mind on. That’s when John Marine rolls by and starts blasting 'em despite me pointing out several times they’re not a threat and even being ordered to stand down (they reluctantly complied).

After the mystery officer took off with them and I hadn’t heard of it after that, I surmise (possibly a different) marine went over there to finish the job, from the random commotion I didn’t pay much attention to over radio at the time anymore.

1 Like

where exactly did you get this from?

The rule only says don’t perma kill, not “You HAVE to revive them”

2 Likes

where exactly did you get this from?

me when i just make shit up because the admins posted a vague announcement and won’t clarify

3 Likes

I mean, I literally said I was part of the reason it was made, and I explained more

i’d love to hear the actual admins speak about the rules because unless i missed a memo I don’t think you are one. i get that you got into shit for it or whatever but in the end “some rando on the forums told me xyz was not allowed” isn’t a great source of actual authority.

3 Likes

My problem is you said

This is false because it never said anything about having to revive them, only not to perma them on purpose (e.g Beheading and shooting corpses)

1 Like