Rule 4's Subrule 'Permanent Removal' (XvH) is vague and subjective.

Its really simple

  • Permanently removing a player from the round by using brute force, or preventing them from being treated, is considered as griefing, even if they belong to a hostile faction.

Don’t intentinally gib people. Thats it. There’s other cases such as for marines preventing each other getting revived there sure but the main one we care about is don’t gib folks on purpose. Real easy. Oh what about the queen gib or warrior decaps? They’re round removals too.

  • Queen’s Banishment, Battlefield Executions, Authorized Executions, and Warrior’s ability, are exceptions to this rule and are evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Sure it doesn’t exactly state the queen gib here but reading between the lines is really really easy. If you have an ability that directly can remove someone? you can use it! So long as you’re mindful about it Preds are here.

  • Whitelisted Yautja players, by the nature of being antagonists, may permanently remove Marines and Xenos from the round. Yautja Council and Staff can review situations that may go against the spirit of the whitelist and take action if necessary.

No one is going to care about you removing a marines head as a warrior but if you’re dragging someone under the dropship or a crate. No matter which side that may be? Marines, xenos, surv, UPP, fucking clowns its caught under this very basic rule and for good reason too, its shitty behaviour. Absolute bad faith slop and yes Marines can be just as bad. Looking at you claymore with a million throwing knifes.

There is leniency for accidents. Way back a surv reported a drone for dragging under the dropship when the drone was trying to get a last cap in, they faced no punishment. Shit happens but just don’t go out of you way to gib someone, its easy. OT grenades and OBs gib plenty and its fine because they’re “usually” not on purpose. There’s no underhanded things here, its pretty straight and narrow. In otherwords? just don’t be a dick.

6 Likes