Cobraman - Commanding Officer Application

Commanding Officer Application - Cobraman

What is your BYOND key?

Cobraman

What is your Discord ID?

cobraman

What is your timezone in UTC?

UTC−05

Player Name You Use Most?

Aden McClymonds

Ban Appeals, Whitelist and Staff Applications:

Cobraman - Commanding Officer Application | Previous CO app, denied in Jan.

Have you been banned in the last 3 months?

No

If so, why?

N/A

Command Knowledge:

How familiar are you with command positions?

I have 30 hours as an SO, and 15 as CMO. To appease Xenocord, I also have 47 hours as Queen.

Hours in XO:

128

Hours in SL:

57

Character Information:

Why did your character decide to become the CO of a ship?

Aden McClymonds worked his way up through politicking to what he thought would be a cushy job as an officer. Instead, he found himself on the wrong end of a influencing scheme that sent him to the front to assist the Dust Raiders from 2175 until their evacuation. He had hoped accepting a promotion to CO would land him back in an office, but he was very wrong.

How did your character attain the position of CO?

Despite not being a seasoned combat veteran like many of his fellow officers, McClymonds loved history. The first space wars between America and then what was called “Red China.” He learned about the great Space Marines such as Nelson Armstrong III of the HMS Rose during the Battle of New Washington, and Col. Alfred Mays USCM who lead a detachment during the Venusian Gas Wars.

During the withdraw of the Neroid Sector, McClymonds became acting CO of a the USS San Antonio when the Command Officer was killed by a CLF boarding party. McClymonds was handling an appeal when the Red Alert was called and led a force from the Brig to capture the CLF. Unfortunately, the command had been decapitated. Despite this, McClymonds used his knowledge of historical orders to clear the rest of the ship and move it into a safe position. For saving the vessel and the marines onboard, McClymonds received a field promotion from Captain to Major.

Provide a short story of your CO.

The son heaved a box of his Dad’s belongings. The hospital had said that whatever he was exposed to on Trijent Dam all those years ago had finally caught up to him. High on oxy, his father was now almost always asleep. Before the end, Aden told his son that, in this box, were some unfinished selections of an autobiography. Carefully, the son unboxed the handwritten manuscript, and turned the first page.

Aden McClymonds was raised with a silver spoon in his mouth. His parents were wealthy enough to not only live on Earth, but own several acres of woodland. This was in large part due to his father’s position in the legal department of the Weyland-Yutani corporation assisting in weapons sales to the USCM. Aden grew up around, but never in the military. Instead, he was sent to private Catholic institutions, as his father hoped he would never take a shine to the military. Unfortunately, Aden had already been corrupted by illusions of power. He had seen the even more opulent lifestyle of the "Military Advisors’’ which Way-You paid when he had to visit them with his father to help build a “transactional relationship.” There was even talk about an arranged marriage between him and one of the advisor’s daughters. Aden, instead, elected to join the USCM himself instead of being trapped in a loveless money marriage.

His father begrudgingly agreed to help Aden’s military career. In no small part because he saw the value in having his son be a member of the USCM. Now Cadet McClymonds went through a somewhat modified ROTC program provided by an elite university. His program indeed had physical fitness in the morning, at 0830. Revelry was at an “early” 0800. Waking up before 0600 was simply unheard of and might have caused a riot. These cadets were not working class people who were going to University on the military’s dime, but instead influential and powerful individuals who wanted a familial military connection. They did indeed study battles, tactics, drills and the like, but only so far as to give the impression they were anything but a military social club.

Cadet McClymonds successfully completed both college and ROTC and thus, commissioned as a 2nd Lt. in 2172. He was originally assigned to the Heinlein Memorial Shipyards, and worked with his father to facilitate weapons transactions between Wey-Yu and the USCM (He was not involved with any Almayer transactions). In 2175, however, his Alma Mater was investigated and shut down due to a congressional investigation. While congress declined to charge any of the students, McClymonds was removed from his post and sent onto the USS San Antonio, where he served as a 1st Lt. SO.

1st Lt. McClymonds was not a terrible SO. He was generally fed orders by the XO or CO and communicated them to the men on the ground. He was not a tactical genius, but he understood that the marines needed to stick together and follow the larger plan. Being somewhat of an oddity as a 1st Lt. SO, McClymonds became the XO of the USS San An by 2178. Many of his operational plans he “borrowed” from other XOs/COs or historical battles. He also kept in regular touch with his father, suggesting new weapons systems and needs for Wey-Yu to sell the USCM. As time went on, however, McClymonds became more suspicious of Wey-Yu and his father, eventually deciding to only help them when it helped him. McClymonds was characterized as either extremely careful or extremely aggressive depending on how he thought the fight was going. He himself rarely deployed or fought, and then never when there was great danger, and so placed great emphasis on what his SLs thought would be best to do.

His career was good, but unremarkable. His break came during the Dust Raider evacuation of 2181. A number of CLF, posing as USMC FORECON survivors, managed to attack the San Antonio’s CIC. An SO managed to swipe for Red after the initial blast went off and called for help. McClymonds led a detachment of MPs and Marines from the Brig to surround the CIC and slowly clear it and the vessel. The fighting was fierce, and ship and crew were heavily damaged. Acting CO McClymonds managed to limp the San Antonio back to drydock. This was the first time McClymonds had managed tactics all on his own, without checking out a holobook or two first. When high command heard the story, they offered to promote Capt. McClymonds to Major McClymonds. He accepted, hoping to be stationed back near Earth, instead he was sent off to the USS Almayer.

A call came from the hospital. His father was alert, possibly for the last time. Quickly, he rushed to the hospital to be with his father, bringing the book with him. When Aden say his autobiography, he began to explain himself, “Son, I need you to know that that book isn’t entirely true. Yes, factually it is true. Your grandfather was a weapons salesman. I did help him. I was a coward, and even a bad commander in my own eyes. But that’s just it, this book is from my own eyes. If it seems negative, it is. Years of service after the Neroid evacuation left me disappointed in why I originally joined the Marines. Every action, until I proved myself on the San An all those years ago, I can’t help but think as being motivated by my father. Perhaps if my CO, or one of the fellow marines, or even your mom wrote this it would have sounded different. There isn’t time for me to ask them. I wrote these sections shortly after learning about my promotion to CO. High Command saw something in me that I did not see in myself. That promotion is what’s killing me now, but it’s also how I met your mother and how I was able to get away from Wey-Yu. I would not have been sent to the Dam if I wasn’t CO of the Almayer, and I wouldn’t have deployed if I felt the need to prove myself. Learn from my mistakes, and tell the grandchildren your father’s story.”

The beep of a medbot signaled a new injection of Oxy, and his fathers eyes closed for the last time.

Command Actions:

When do you believe it’s appropriate to pardon a prisoner?

It’s appropriate to pardon a prisoner when at least two conditions (A and C), but preferably all three are met:
A) The prisoner shows remorse and plans to make amends and not commit the crime again.
B) The victim, or the CO standing in for the USMC as a victim of certain crimes, is amiable to the idea of the pardon
C) Keeping the marine imprisoned would have negative consequences to the operation.

Give some examples of when you would or would not use pardon.

The Charlie Smartgunner and Delta Smartgunner get into a chair fight during briefing. Both are imprisoned but are respectful to the MPs and do not vandalize the brig. Upon interrogation they are willing to apologize to one another. Meanwhile marines have deployed and are fighting. I would pardon them as they meet all three criteria.

The Delta SL, infuriated by the arrest of his SG, attempts to break into CIC and begins harassing Command over the radio. His squad has a Spec set as aSL while he is arrested, but the SL does not change his demeanor. Despite the impact to the operation, I would not pardon the SL because they are not reformed or remorseful from their actions, a key end of justice.

In a different scenario, a maintenance tech breaks into the CLs office in order to steal her smokes. The CL catches the MT and the MT is arrested. The CL does not want to drop charges, but the arrested MT is the only MT awake, shipboard decon has been authorized, and has been a model tech otherwise. The tech promises to fix the CL’s door he hacked and to not break into places again. Despite failing to meet condition B, I would judge in these scenarios that the use of a pardon would still fulfill the ends of justice while taking into account the needs of the operation.

When do you believe it’s appropriate to use a Battlefield Execution?

Battlefield Execution is the supreme judicial tool of the CO, unilaterally taking someone out of the round and also reducing his force size. They should only be used when the crime is so serious as to warrant immediate execution, or, when someone is so disruptive to the RP of a round that, for the sake of others, the character needs to be removed from the story. Battlefield execution is as much of an OOC punishment (being taken out of the round) as it is an IC use, and thus should be treated as such.

Give some examples of when you would or would not use Battlefield Execution.

Where I would not use BE:
The Pilot Officer is told to use his own belief when to evacuate planet side. The queen begins to board the Alamo, and so the PO panic locks the ships and takes off, leaving some Marines behind. I would not use BE here because the PO was following orders and attempted to do his best, even if it wasn’t perfect.

A delta marine deconstructs all the chairs at briefing then breaks into the bubble and replaces all the chairs with beds. I would not use a BE here as, while low RP, this does not rise to the level of a serious crime. I instead would let the MPs handle the issue.

Where I would use BE:
A PO, seeing alien forces besiege the FOB, begins calling for marines to evacuate despite orders against it. He leaves several marines behind by leaving, intentionally against orders, far too early. Here the PO is not trying his best, and his negligence rises to the matter of a serious crime, as well as ruining the round for others. I would use BE here because it is proportionate to the negligence and/or malice of the marine involved, as well as rising to the occasion of an OOC punishment.

A delta marine is standing in front of the bubble before briefing. He has stolen the hanger megaphone, and is using it to seriously insult myself, my command staff, my plan after being told to stop, and disrupting briefing. This would rise to the level of a Battlefield Execution. The marine is seriously undermining the marine’s confidence in me, attempting to counterman my plan, and is generally being Low RP. In character, a BE would make sense as a show of force against any possible rioters while it is a fitting OOC punishment for disrupting the round.

A doctor creates a stimulate which has some major negative side effects, such as addiction. He deploys this stim without telling me or the CMO. Upon hearing that he has harmed marines, he is unrepentant and continues to make and distribute the drug. In this case, I would use a BE as the crime is so serious and the disregard for other marines so great as to rise to the level of immediate execution. It is also a fitting OOC punishment, provided there is no RP reason for him to have done this. If there was an RP reason, for example he was actually a CLF saboteur, I would consider arresting him in stead for the sake of roleplay.

4 Likes

Howdy! CO councilman here.

One of the biggest issues we had with your last application period was finding you around to vet your abilities in person. Between that and your conflict with a provost last month I’ll put cards on the table and say you will really want to be active and on your A game while this application is open.

I will likely be following up in the future with some questions. Good luck, Aden. I hope you knock them dead.

2 Likes

+1 dis sucka is awesome :fire:

2 Likes

I have recently begun to play more command roles as to expand my knowledge and experience in CM. I have interacted with Aden numerous times, and they have been nothing but positive. They have shown me their roleplay ability as XO and I believe he would be a good addition to the WL.

+1 from me big boy

2 Likes

Hi there!

Before I begin my comment, full disclosure, I dont believe we’ve ever met in game in any significant capacity, so I wont be leaving a +1/-1 on this application, since I feel that characterizing a CO purely based upon their written app is unfair.

That being said, I did want to provide some pretty broad feedback, and discuss a point I think you could possibly improve upon

I’ve read both this application, and (skim)read your previous, and for what its worth, Im really impressed by a vast majority of it.

  • You’ve doubled your XO hours since your last application, which is a a feat of determination within itself!
  • Your pardon answers are well written, if a little surface level. Although, this is literally a 2D space game, so its not the end of the world. You make your legal philosophy clear, which is all that we ask.
  • Personally, my biggest compliment goes to your CO story, with my only criticism being that it wasn’t longer! I found the premise of your characters cushy Corporate station dramatically devolving into chaos a super interesting and realistic setting for the Aliens universe. I find the idea that a nepo-baby is forced to face the horrors of war as their Marine Platoons get ripped apart, quite frankly, hilarious. Great work!

However, I did want to make a note of particular parts in your BE examples, and provide some general room for improvement, as I said earlier.

I've had a chat with some other current COs regarding this particular example, as well as the one following it, and I'll try my best to clearly articulate my opinion.

This situation, as you’ve stated it, is indeed applicable use of a field execution as defined by the CO code of conduct. A Marine deliberately undermining your efforts to deliver a briefing can range anywhere from a disorderly conduct charge, to sedition, depending. However, It feels like you’ve missed a couple steps here, which are CRUCIAL to your use of a BE.

While yes, you did give the Marine fair warning to your use of force, I think you 100% should have explored an MP response to the troublemaker before giving them a bullet to the brain. BEs majoritvely should not be used when a less lethal alternative is available, such as (in this case) being perma-brigged for sedition, and your failure to mention whether or not an MP was on the scene able to make an arrest, despite doing so in almost every prior BE scenario, almost implies that you’d choose to execute the Marine regardless, which is disturbing.

Another aspect I’d like to point out is that, while the use of force in these kinds of situations is very much up to the individual, with different COs choosing varying levels of lethality based on the lore and ideals of their character, the immediate execution of what is essentially a loudmouth during a routine operations briefing feels disproportionately violent for a newly promoted Commanding Officer whose defining personal experience involved their father literally dying in their arms from the horrors of war.

2 Likes

Spy,

Thanks a lot for your feedback, I spent a lot of time trying to improve since the last application.

I agree that my BE section is defiantly still the weakest part of my application. If this application is denied, what I will do is write down scenarios I find while playing where I would like to use BE, and list them for the 3rd app. My researcher scenario is based off of something I found in play.

In writing this scenario, I was envisioning an exceptional disruption disruption caused by this marine, not just your average briefing shenaniganry. Think starting a pre-briefing riot that the MPs cannot contain. The reason I elect to take the Marine is in line with my conceptualization of BE. The Marines who are just around to be turbo shitters will often break out of brig and be a continuing problem for the MPs, or they will go SSD as soon as they are thrown in the Brig. Some level of disruption is good for the MPs, but a player whose only goal is to be LRP for an entire round is a different story. The use of a BE to punish someone by taking them out of a round would hopefully encourage them to RP better in future rounds.

As a last note “a newly promoted Commanding Officer whose defining personal experience involved their father literally dying in their arms from the horrors of war”. I think there’s a misreading of my story here. This story is set in the future with the son reading excepts of an autobiography. It’s his son watching ADEN die in the future, not Aden watching his father die. I will continue to talk with COs and learn how to use BE in a way which facilitates good role play. If this app does get approved, I do not plan on using a BE unless the case absolutely and unquestioningly warrants it (attempted violent Mutiny, etc.) until I can better develop my understanding of it.

2 Likes

First time giving any sort of plus to these so someone yell at me if I do it wrong.

I’ve encountered Captain Aden with me being an SL, SO, and a few other various roles that are evading finer details in my memory. Nonetheless each operation with him in the bubble (good or bad) he’s shown to be a capable leader. Balancing and delegating tasks to the appropriate personnel while focusing on the operation. His roleplay ability is rather solid with little to no grammar or spelling mistakes.

+1 I think he would be a great addition to the Whitelist as he seems very comfortable in the captains seat and conducts himself as a well educated officer.

2 Likes

Hey McClymonds! I’ve been wanting to comment on your app for a good bit of time but I’ve been loathe to actually organize my thoughts until now, so here goes it.

You’re a good guy, there isn’t any doubt about it. You have at no point been a complete and utter dick making wild comments and associating with stupid individuals. Most every interaction I’ve had with you has been pleasant and you’re genuinely a fun person to RP and play the game with. I don’t now, nor have I ever had any problems with you as an individual.

I do, unfortunately, have some issues with your application that I can’t bring myself to overlook nor ignore.

Pardons

You say that it’d be appropriate to pardon a prisoner when they meet solely the following two criteria.

  • “The prisoner shows remorse and plans to make amends and not commit the crime again.”
  • “Keeping the marine imprisoned would have negative consequences to the operation.”
    In my eyes, at the very least, this is giving the impression that all you require to pardon someone is a few pretty words and for them to be in a limited slot role.

In your first example you describe 2 SGs beating the shit out of each other in briefing, something that is not only LRP but just plain stupid. Why are you wasting a pardon on this? If they both got hit with assault that’s 15 minutes in the brig, which seems to be a perfectly acceptable punishment for doing banal roundstart bullshittery. Sure they’re going to be immediately deploying to the ground once they’re out, but why are you putting your own head on the line for a 15 minute charge?

Your second example - you say you’d not pardon the SL because they aren’t ““reformed”” or remorseful for their actions. Are you implying that you’d pardon an SL that tried to break into CIC and was harassing your command staff on comms if they were remorseful? Again, why would you even consider putting your head on the line for someone who has shown a flagrant disregard for common sense like this?

As for your third example, I can vibe with your reasoning to an extent. Although they clearly aren’t a “model MT” if they’re breaking into the CL’s office to steal cigarettes (that are publicly available elsewhere on the ship). I will ask if you’d reconsider your pardon if shipside deconstruction wasn’t authorized, does that change the equation based on your third criterion?

Battlefield Executions

I don’t like BEs, I don’t like taking people out of rounds, I don’t like to deal with the stress of justifying my actions after the fact. I can appreciate that you understand the gravity of a BE because it’s not something to be thrown around liberally. However, there seems to be somewhat of a disconnect between your expressed philosophy and some of the examples you’ve given.

You state “They should only be used when the crime is so serious as to warrant immediate execution” or “when someone is so disruptive to the RP of a round that, for the sake of others, the character needs to be removed from the story.” What this suggests to me is that you plan to use BEs for heinous acts/capital crimes and for when people are being exceptionally LRP.

  • In your fourth example I don’t see a crime that is “so serious as to warrant immediate execution” nor do I see someone being “so disruptive to the RP of a round” that they need to be removed “for the sake of others.” What I see is a Delta PFC being a dumbass Delta PFC, something that is exceptionally normal. While, as Murphy said, the BE does fall within guidelines as the man is being LRP, it’s much more fitting to toss them to the MPs and either lock them up for DaSO or a Discretionary Detainment.

  • I don’t see your last example as being realistic unless you’re describing a situation in which there are 0 other researchers, a completely hands-off CMO, and 0 MPs. This researcher cannot manufacture stims if he’s not in either medbay or research. That places him somewhere that is firmly within the reach of your MP staff who have the tools and ability to march down there and flat out arrest him. This doesn’t fit in line with your affirmation that a “Battlefield Execution is the supreme judicial tool of the CO” but looks significantly more like you got frustrated with research shenanigans and acted out.

I also take issue with you consistently referencing OOC punishment in your BE examples. As COs we’re not moderators, we’re not admins, we’re not maintainers, and we’re not management. We’re an IN CHARACTER role taking IN CHARACTER actions, at no point are we passing OOC judgement through what we do unless we’re watching a rulebreak take place, at which point you should ahelp. You should NEVER EVER be using a BE as an “OOC punishment for disrupting the round.” I resent the implication that anyone should.

Your Story

I think the premise of a future look at your character on his deathbed, reminiscing on days gone by, is an interesting premise. The problem is that it’s exceptionally short - If you plug it into a google doc it comes up short of 2 pages. Now, nobody is asking you to write an award winning novella or to be the next Roald Dahl, but writing a story that is less than 2 pages doesn’t show me that you’re capable of being creative or telling an interesting story (which reflects poorly on RP).

My biggest issue with giving my own opinion on you as a potential CO is rooted in your actual commanding skills, however. You had 128 hours in XO when you posted this app and I know the number has only grown over the past 10 days. Yet I have seen 0 improvement on your ability to actually be a leader. I recently CO’d for you on a Shivas round and got into the weeds with you on everything that went wrong. What I saw, and brought up to you, has been part and parcel of a trend that has been repeatedly noted about you as a leader.

  • You don’t make announcements and when you do they don’t include information that is useful. You’re expected to respond quickly and concisely to the needs of the marines and the changing flow of the battle, and it’s been consistently noted that you’re slow to action (if taking any action at all) in what is an incredibly fast-paced role.

    • I made the suggestion to you that you could remind marines to make use of CAS and Mortar if you can’t think of anything else to say. I find it EXTREMELY concerning that your response was “What’s the point if they’re all dying? They won’t listen.”
  • You’re confusing when you give orders to both marines and your own CIC staff. I can directly point to the recent Shivas briefing in which I’d stated that I was getting confused by your explanation of the plan when I SIGNED OFF ON IT. If you’re the CO, people are going to expect you to be clear when you speak, you will not succeed if you’re consistently stumbling over your words.

  • You struggle to get the marines organized and motivated, which is related to the above criticism. Even when you’re clear on the orders you’re giving, you aren’t firm when you’re giving them. I’ve noticed that you phrase your orders as suggestions, and if you’re suggesting the marines fallback to their fortifications instead of getting a sick clip on that lurker, they won’t be doing it.

I know it’ll come across as harsh, but for the life of me I can’t think of any nicer way to phrase these. Please try to take it as a way to improve upon your skills rather than a mean-spirited indictment of you as a commander, because it’s not intended to be. I know you have the temperament for the role and I know you genuinely want to be a CO, not just to have a cool blue name.

As far it goes for this app, I can’t give you anything but a -1.
You need time to grow and improve upon your skills as a commander, I don’t think it’s feasible to get done this time around.

1 Like

Hey Mike,

First off I really do value your feedback. You’re one of the first people who got me really thinking about becoming a CO. However, I want to answer or push back on a few points of critisism.

This would change my idea. So long as he made reparation to the CL in someway (buying another pack of smokes if pardoned) I would go through with it.

That round of Shivas was not reflective of my ability to CO. It was simply a terrible round for me, including the botched plan. The round after (with the 3 COs) was much more reflective, in my opinion, of my ability to become a commanding officer. While I agree that this has been an issue in the past, most of my rounds are an improvement on the pattern. The Shiva’s round was just a complete and utter fumble for me. Doing simple things such as making sure that I have a map pulled up on my other monitor, and trying to ensure I don’t get caught up on low-impact RP such as paperwork as really improved my ability.

This perhaps was a bit of a snarky comment. I had watched basically 90% of the platoon die in one sweep because I was momentarily paying attention to something else. I’m not really sure anything would have changed that due to how the Marines had moved. I still genuinely don’t think that it would have changed the outcome of that particular engagement, but I agree that I could have reminded them more often.

This is something I haven’t ever really gotten feedback for before, but I can defiantly see it. How would you suggest I improve?

This is not me saying I don’t have problems because I defiantly do, but I wanted to push that the Shiva’s round was the worst I had in a long time, and not completely reflective of my CO abilities.

1 Like

For what little it counts, i wanted to say ive been ASO and SO with you a fair bit when youve been XO.
You stand out to me as one of my favorite people to play with; i find you fair, tactical, fun to RP with, and level. your map and round knowledge shows itself in the plans that youve given to me for a round. I have no issue there.

To harrysno’s points, there are moments of (what can i call them?) defeatism? The structure of the game provides repetitive gameplay from CIC in that you can probably predict the general tendency of marines to follow through on a specific part of a plan, and can gauge what the outcome would be on such a case (spoiler alert: players are stubborn and only loosely feel a sense of connection to a greater “game plan”; CIC is herding cats, etc etc). And i think we, you, me, any CO, all probably know this from an OOC standpoint, and we can command This or That to try and fix it but the general trend of how marines respond will still be about what we expect.

I think what i see is that sometimes that knowingness does affect your IC presentation of things; stuff will fold, so why even bother, you know? And it’s not that your intuition of things here is wrong, per se, but that i think IC, as a CO, you have to have stubborn, almost blind persistence. You (the character) have to really believe there’s a chance, even if you (the player) have a good hunch there isn’t.

I think that’s all from me but I’m comfortable in the rounds I’ve done with you and can recognize youve accumulated coveted Game Sense to know how to command an op; i give a +1 since the nuance of stubborn persistence is a trait that i do sincerely think you’d take to quickly anyways.

2 Likes

Similarly to nyoom’s feedback, I have been an SO under you a few times now I think and the one thing I noticed was there were quite a bit of command announcements being made, which had me feeling very comfortable in my spot as many announcements means I have an easier time communicating specifics to the marines as SO.

My only feedback that hasn’t been detailed by other responses is that I feel like from the story you gave, I haven’t seen much of that at all in the character that gets portrayed at all right now in CIC, and sometimes I feel like stuff like this requires the flanderization of characters in SS13 since rounds are ~1.5-2.5 hours and you don’t have that much time in reality to present yourself as a character, I think becoming a bolder personality (as in presenting what you believe your character is more often, not becoming more bold) would work out in your favor a lot.

+1

edit: after some more recent rounds, I will say I do agree with sandvich’s comments about blaming others

2 Likes

When things go wrong and seem to be your fault, you blame it on everyone but yourself. You seem to lack some thick skin that dudes playing command need, but at least you haven’t had a complete melt down. Be more humble, take the blame and criticism to heart even if it’s filled with insults. If you get this WL, you’ll represent everyone on it. A CO closed off to any criticism ain’t fun to play under and doesn’t build good rep. Respect for sticking on your own path though, shows good confidence.

Work on your showman ship and presentation as a dude in command. Right now you’re just bland besides your funny name. Orders should be short and sweet but should have character spewing out of them. I can tell the difference when Goken Demir gives an order vs George Franks cause they both have unique personalities that leak into their announcements

You got the spazz, that magic, the good shit, you just need some more development and you’ll be a solid Major kicking ass and pushing paper. Next time listen if a councilor offers advice cause they’re giving it to help you get this WL and be all you can be. Don’t be afraid to reach out for help, it doesn’t make you look incompetent, it makes you a better player and applicant.

-1

4 Likes

Salutations all,

Over the last week to two weeks my CM hours have been inadequate. This is in no small part because my father was hospitalized recently with a heart condition, and will be having surgery Friday. I understand that my CO application was already unlikely to go through, but I am choosing to NOT withdraw the application so I may elicit more feedback.

11 Likes

My thoughts are with you both. I hope you’re doing okay :saluting_face:

5 Likes

After reviewing this application, the Council thinks you’ve got some way to go first before being eligible material for the CO whitelist. The application could use some work, in particular your BE/pardon answers; I’m not going to restate what’s been said about them already, since the COs in here that gave their responses mirror what the Council’s would have been. You’ve also not got a lot of community support lately, which is important for the application to have good standing in our eyes.

I understand you’ve been going through life problems, and so I’m not going to unfairly say “Oh you should’ve played more,” or the like. Instead, I’d like for you to take the time to address the valuable feedback the people here have left you – there are a lot of good points to be made, after all – and try to build up your character and your understanding of the Code of Conduct more. A good rule of thumb when it comes to BEs is, as stated in the CoC, that they should be used to remove an active or potential threat first and foremost, and only if there are no other options that can be done in time. You’ll get to know the nuances of it later, though, there’s no need to memorize it like you’re going to take a bar exam for it or anything.

The Council wanted to stress, in the end, that you shouldn’t be afraid to ask for help from the Council regarding either the application or even just getting an assessment of your standing odds. There’s no harm in asking for help – after all, asking for help is what leaders always do – and make sure to take feedback to heart, and reach out if you have questions either from the Councilors or from the people who’ve given their 2 cents on your app.

Until then, your application has unfortunately been denied. You may reapply in 30 days on June 29, 2024.

2 Likes

Added co:denied and removed co:waiting