I would like to suggest an addendum: if staff are unclear about the enforceability of this, a policy clarification is necessary.
Rules are indeed only effective and fair if they are clear and understandable, ensuring that everyone knows what is expected of them and can act accordingly.
Many individuals, including a well respected major and a fairly competent researcher, seem to doubt the clarity of the situation.
Additionally the rule of Rule 5: Mechanical Exploits states that:
Do not abuse bugs or unintended features to gain an unfair advantage for yourself or your team.
I believe that the mechanics involving greenos dying and providing a heart, blood, or pheromones are intentional; otherwise, this could have been easily fixed in the code with just a simple one-line adjustment.
One possible interpretation of greenos is that they should either target marines or the prime hive. This aligns with your experiences in the game.
Although:
If you are a researcher who has never played the research role or encountered greenos before and you come across the concept of them, you might conclude that you can utilize them for pheromones or bio-points.
In no way do I believe this isn’t bullshit for the xeno who sat in queue.
Unrelated to this post:
I firmly believe that greenos are detrimental to the gameplay loop. When players enter the xenomorph queue, they naturally harbor a vendetta against marines, which only incentives them to go against marines.
It’s annoying that greenos will often deploy and immediately choose to engage humans. There should be a clear incentive for greenos to ally with humans rather than siding with the prime hive.
Furthermore, the amount of role-play you get from a green queen is far too dependent on that queen’s playtime. Xenos exist on the fine line between low-roleplay and mid-roleplay, and that needs to be addressed.
Honestly, many found this situation as a sort of fuckyou to greenos for all the times they’ve fucked over marines.
Edit:
I want to make it clear that the issue I am bringing up is that someone could misconstrue how this could be a rule 5 break.